Friday, March 13, 2026

Beady Eye: Infinitely More Interesting Than Oasis And Easier On The Ears...At Least My Ears

 


I can't recall why I don't recall listening to Beady Eye when the records were released, but if I was under oath I might say, "I was so over Oasis by 2011, I didn't care about any more music from either Gallagher." 

Well, they do sound like Oasis, but only because the singer is the same. And they write songs influenced by 60's Brit Invasion and psychedelia, like Oasis. But there is something else going on, or should I say, something less. 

My biggest issue with Oasis was that they had no finesse. It was all too much. Too many guitars. Too many layers. Too loud. Every inch of tape utilized whether or not it was a good idea. Plus, I just don't think they had enough great songs per album. I still think "(What's The Story) Morning Glory" is a classic. But everything before or after left me cold. That said, I regret not seeing them on the recent reunion tour, as I haven't heard one bad thing from anyone about those shows. I did see them twice around "Morning Glory" and both shows was fantastic.

But that's sorta not why I am here 

I am loving Beady Eye. They are easier to swallow. They are far more interesting to me, more melodic and not as hamfisted, and if wasn't for White Trash Soul and his excellent singles compilation, I might not have heard a note.

 










1 comment:

steve simels said...

Oasis was always one of those "lord knows I've tried" bands. I.e., I knew I should like them but they did nothing for me. 😎