As sure as the sun will rise, a new Rolling Stones record will bring on the usual comments and criticisms across the internet, from the old warhorse "The Stones haven't been good since Mick Taylor left," which isn't true, to the new heavyweight champion, "We should all be grateful the band is still around to make music for us."
I am grateful, but that won't stop me from saying something stinks if it indeed stinks.
Thankfully, "Foreign Tongues" does not stink. Not by a long shot. But it has its problems, though they are minor.
I loved "Hackney Diamonds." It was the first Stones record I loved since "Steel Wheels" in 1989. (I actually love "Stripped" from 1995 more, but that wasn't new material.) Still, I wasn't looking as forward to "Foreign Tongues" as I was to the last album because I already knew it would be "Hackney Diamonds 2," since all of the tracks were recorded at the same time.
And it is, for better or worse.
The first single "Rough & Twisted" is basically "Black Limousine" from "Tattoo You," only louder and hotter thanks to loud and hot producer Andrew Watt.
The second single "In The Stars" uses the same guitar riff from "Angry," the first single off the last album, and unfortunately has verses that sound a little too much like the atrocious "You Got Me Rockin'."
"Never Wanna Lose You" uses the same vocal trick on the chorus that was used on "Get Close" from "Hackney."
"Hit Me In The Head" is "Bite Your Head Off" from "Hackney," sorta. It's hard and punky and Mick is hollering and the word "head" is in both titles. So there.
"Some Of Us" is the token Keef ballad like "Tell Me Straight" from "Hackney," though "Some Of Us" is the better song.
"Side Effects" sounds a bit too much like "Mess It Up" from the previous album to love it. But I do like it.
The album's penultimate track "Back In Your Life" has a slow burn gospel coda just like "Sweet Sounds Of Heaven," the penultimate track on the last album, but musically it's almost exactly like "Depending On You" from the last album. It's a great six minutes, regardless, thanks to the great guitar work of what I hope is Keef & Ronnie.
And the closer is an acoustic cover of Chuck Berry's "Beautiful Delilah" just as the "Hackney" closer was an acoustic Muddy Waters cover.
I mean, why not call the album "Acme Hymens?"
The template is almost identical to "Hackney Diamonds."
The biggest problem though is the length. 62 minutes is 22 minutes too long, and creating an edit was pretty easy for me since there are a few more lemons on this one than there were on the last.
Any good news? Absolutely.
The band sounds great and the songs that work are truly terrific. Mick's falsetto on "Jealous Lover" will take you back to "Emotional Rescue," which may not be a good thing for some of you, but for me, it's perfect. It's also a great breather from the LOUDNESS of the first two songs.
"Ringing Hollow" and "Some Of Us" at the moment, are my two favorite tracks on the record. The former, for lack of a better description, is a country protest song and the latter is simply gorgeous.
"Covered In You," "Back In Your Life" and "Divine Intervention" are as good, if not better than half of "Hackney Diamonds." "Divine Intervention" could have been on "Some Girls."
But "Mr Charm" is classic bad Mick, and the Amy Winehouse cover should have been left in the studio. The backing track has its moments, but there is nothing slinky or sexy about Mick's delivery. The whole thing is a bit like a bull in a China shop and it doesn't make the album better. No doubt it would have been more welcome if it popped up on YouTube five years from now.
And speaking of Mick, it seems that he is mostly yelling than singing on this album. He still sounds great, but it got me thinking. Andrew Watt's production in always in the red. Is Mick yelling to be heard, or has Mick at 83 lost the nuance in his voice to simply sing, therefore leaving Watt to compensate by turning everything up to 11? It's a theory. Maybe a weak one, but I'm still thinking about it.
Paul McCartney is back and is much better here on "Covered In You." Steve Winwood is on almost all of the record. Robert Smith of The Cure sings back-up, but I didn't notice. And Bruno Mars is credited as playing cowbell on one track, thank god.
The best thing I could say about "Foreign Tongues" after only two spins is something I can't say about records like "Dirty Work," "Voodoo Lounge," "A Bigger Bang" and "Bridges To Babylon" after multiple spins. I already remember the songs I enjoyed. This record is full of hooks and with some tweaking, it will play better and get played often. I already loved it more the second time around.
"Foreign Tongues" comes in over 439 variants, including vinyl, colored vinyl (colors include blue, green, white, avocado, raw umber, teal, and a very limited Tilda Swinton translucent), cassette, cassingle, Chu-Bop, 8-track, reel to reel, and a special chip injected into your arm which you can program to isolate any vocal or instrument on any song from the album. Japanese fans have the bonus chip which offers all of the stems from "Gomper.")

33 comments:
"Acme Hymens" - hahaha. What's wrong with cowbell?
- Paul in DK
Nothing wrong with cowbell. The sarcasm was about the credit.
Yes, one Bruno is more than enough.
- Paul in DK
I like Bruno! Thanks for the rundown of the new album. The last graph about all the various options to buy was funny, though I wish Tilda Swinton translucent was a thing.
I'm holding out for the chip in the arm. 😎
I love "Tilda Swinton translucent."
Found an ad in an old Us magazine, 1981, asking if "this could be the last" Stones' tour. When WLS in Chicago was promoting that '81 tour they asked the same question with "Last Time" as the music bed.
Not a big Stones fan but heard "Hackney Diamonds" in my friend's record shop and was highly impressed.
Bob in IL
I’m hoping for the holographic AI tour in about 2036.
Captain Al
I'm glad there are multiple versions to purchase, if I was still into vinyl I'd pay the big bux for the black edition.
Picking it up today. We'll see. I'll get back to you.
"Some of Us" sounds like Keith channeling Mark Knopfler.
Only two plays in but as you mentioned I think the biggest problem is the length which has been an issue for the Stones since Voodoo Lounge. I thought they finally realized with Hackney Diamonds that a run time of 40-50 mins plays much better. Seeing that these songs were recorded at the same time as HD I'm shocked someone convinced them to keep it to 48 mins. I'll have to listen a few more times to decide what I would pare. For instance, I would have left Sweet Sounds of Heaven off HD not because it's a bad song but I just think plays better without it. Might have fit better on Foreign Tongues. My favorites so far were Rough & Twisted and Beautiful Delilah. Mr Charm jumped out to me as well which obviously you did not care for, but then again I also like You Got Me Rockin ;-). There were no songs that I immediately disliked but they definitely started blending together as the album progressed which I think is a probably because it's too long rather than the fault of the songs themselves. Overall I like Foreign Tongues and look forward to a few more listens to see which songs really start to stand out once it fully sinks in.
My best friend was the engineer on Voodoo Lounge - great stories
I'm really enjoying the album. The only two songs I can do without are Side Effects and Mr Charm. As I read someplace else, HD sounded like the Stone emerging from the coffin. FT sounds like they are fully alive. I'll take that.
"Ringing Hollow" is the immediate stand-out for me. Plus it's the first song where Mick's vocals are good and he sounds like Mick! The previous tracks the vocals sounded a little buried in the mix.
I feel the complete opposite. Everything is so loud, Mick is yelling over the music. I wish he was buried in the mix, or at least evened out.
Rob- any that you can share?
Sound check wasn't going well
Mick wanted an umpteenth retake, Keith was long finished and wanted done - he and Mick argued and Keith stormed into the control booth and said - I am F'n gonna kill Jagger
Oh yeah there's a sharp Keith, Waddy tale... 😉
I'd go for the Chatty Cathy doll version where you pull the string and she yells "Mick!" and wets her pants.
One thing I'll say in favor to this new one is anything on it is better than "Now And Then"
What is "Now & Then?"
Beatles song ? I'm not following thread either here.
I agree with your review, but I dont think the tunes were recorded at the same time as Hackney. Their genesis was from those sessions, but actual recording was later. Worth listening to the podcast ( narrated by Nora Jones!) interviewing the different players. Speaking in Tongues. It si on Spotify ( which I dont use) as well as most other platforms https://youtu.be/M3y-1S0v3rw?si=Kjug2Xj3p8eTVlXR
Sal, you of all people - N&T was the J Lennon song worked in the studio after his death
I was skeptical but thought I'd give it a listen, and. damn if this isn't as enjoyable as heck. I'm not sure it will stay in regular rotation but the first few times through, and it feels like a great rock and roll record.
It does bring up something I've been thinking a lot about lately and curious if anyone of my vintage has been experiencing the same thing. I've just turned 71 and while I don't listen to less music the records I do listen to regularly have narrowed considerably in number. It's as if it feels like the less time i have left, the more time I want to spend with the best records I have. Will I set the new stones aside for sticky fingers or Exile? Probably. Even the Beatles, I haven't put on Magical Mystery Tour in months but I listen to blue rodeo's Five Days in July, one of the best records I own, constantly. Just tossing out a number, if I listened to 500 albums ten years ago, I seem to have narrowed that number to 250.
Rob, me of all people didn't make the connection immediately. Referencing a different band was confusing. Plus, I don't hate "Now & Then."
I am still in my 60's, but once NYCD closed, which is now almost 20 years ago, I no longer felt the pressure of having to listen to "new" music or "hot new artist du jour." It was a necessity back then and quite often torture. I stopped enjoying music because I rarely played the music I wanted to hear. I played music that I needed to review or simply know about so I could satisfy customers.
Now, almost everything I listen to daily is music I want to hear.
Sal you are correct, I sure was not very clear on the point I was trying to make. I should have stated that whenever a new Stones or Beatles song comes out they will invariably be compared to each other. As I am comparing the last Beatle's song "Now And Then" to "Foreign Tongues" The former just was not up to Fab's quality. Hell, George even thought it was a waste of time. Sorry I was so obscure
Hilarious and spot on review. I really really really like this record (and the last one). MUCH more so than anything from the 90s or "Bigger Bang" (although I still defend "Streets of Love"). But drop some of the weaker tracks here and you have something approaching a mini-classic. And that, at this stage of their careers, is a miracle.
I think Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, and A Bigger Bang are all as good or better than Hackney Diamonds and Foreign Tongues if you edit them down to 40-45 mins.
Excellent review. I wish more reviews were like this - most of them in MOJO and Uncut - as much as I read and enjoy them - not to mention reviews in Rolling Stone and other publications - seem to approach reviewing albums as:
- Describing what the band is like to those who don't know (granted, I have no idea who half the artists are in every MOJO, so maybe that's ok to some extent)
- Describing where this album falls in the arc of an artist's career. Not really reviewing/judging it - just providing Wikiipedia content - "here's where we are on their timeline)
- And almost everything in MOJO these days gets 4 stars or 3 stars, with the former dominating.
This review is more useful to me, especially the comments about Mick's vocals, the production style, and areas where they seem to be either hewing to a Stones trope from the past (even the recent "Hackney" past, if you will) or seem to be consciously trying to be "now"
I'm glad you like it overall. I did like "Hackney Diamonds," and plan to get this one.
Would love to see a long review like this of the new McCartney, unless you did that and I missed it. I'm a bit leery of McCartney's record being overly self-reflective, like "Here's my history, mate. You WILL enjoy hearing my reflections about my early days - do you understand that assignment?"
"Tilda Swinton Translucent" I'm dying!
Post a Comment